Lorna's Housing Plan for Ward 7
By Lorna Antwi, candidate for Toronto City Council, Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek
Why Approvals Are Not Becoming Homes
- Approvals aren't becoming homes. By June 2026, Toronto had reached 73.7% of its annual first-planning-approval target, but only 21.5% of its housing-start target. City of Toronto
- Private financing is a barrier. CMHC explains: “Lenders typically require a pre-sale threshold of 70% prior to releasing funds.” Without sufficient presales, condominium projects struggle to secure construction financing. CMHC
- The City must take greater responsibility. Instead of relying on private developers to finance and carry the risks of housing development, Toronto should use its public land, municipal financing opportunities and ability to sustain longer returns to build affordable and RGI housing.
Lorna's Commitment to Ward 7
Lorna will aggressively pursue new housing development throughout Ward 7, working with private developers, nonprofits and public agencies to create more affordable, rent-geared-to-income, family-sized and market-rent housing, while protecting and improving the community facilities and services residents depend on.
Fast-Track Housing Development on Public Land
- Public Assets & Accountability
- Affordability
- City Services & Workforce
Stakeholders
Toronto residents; tenants; households awaiting rent-geared-to-income (RGI) housing; community-service users; municipal employees and unions; local businesses; taxpayers.
Outcomes
Housing
- More affordable and RGI housing.
- Reduced housing waitlists.
- Fewer missed development opportunities.
Economic Sustainability
- Greater long-term returns on public assets.
- Local jobs and economic opportunities.
- Reduced future replacement costs.
Community Benefits
- Preserved and improved public services.
- Community participation in decisions.
Accountability & Transparency
- Published financial comparisons.
- Disclosure of conflicts of interest.
- Recorded Council votes and justifications.
- Reduced opportunities for preferential dealings.
Proposed Action
Toronto already has Toronto Builds and expedited approvals. I will seek Council approval to require housing referrals at three triggers, with coordinated financing, approvals and construction delivery for viable projects.
Triggered on:
- Property sale: A City-owned property is being considered for sale.
- Facility replacement: A municipal facility is scheduled for major reconstruction or replacement.
- Annual property review: A new mandatory ward-by-ward review of existing City records identifies underused land or buildings with housing potential.
Fast-tracking development:
- Start earlier: Refer sites to Toronto Builds before disposal or major facility replacement decisions.
- Work simultaneously: Coordinate design, financing and departmental reviews wherever lawful.
- Eliminate duplication: Reuse existing City records, studies and approvals work.
- Accelerate approvals: Apply the existing Toronto Builds expedited process to eligible proposals.
- Move to construction: Assign a responsible project lead to resolve delays and advance viable, funded projects.
Proposals would consider public ownership, deeply affordable and RGI housing, rent-to-own, recreation, childcare and revenue-producing commercial space.
Accountability: Publish costs, financial comparisons, progress and reasons development cannot proceed. Where public ownership offers greater long-term value, any proposed sale must undergo public consultation and a documented Council decision.
Duration: Continue mandatory referrals and annual reviews until the RGI housing waitlist backlog is eliminated.
Sources, Evidence & Case Studies
Existing foundation: Toronto Builds - PH21.4 directs City-owned land to be considered for housing. Housing Development Governance - EX25.1 establishes City housing delivery oversight and expedited approvals. The proposed changes would make referrals mandatory at defined triggers, extend reviews to underused properties across wards and coordinate work to reduce delays.
Tools: Established Policy and Regulation
EXPANDToronto Builds - PH21.4: require referrals when property-sale, facility-replacement or annual-review triggers occur.
EXPANDHousing Development Governance - EX25.1: apply existing expedited project-delivery and approval arrangements to eligible referred sites.
MODIFYMunicipal Code Chapter 213: integrate housing-value review into applicable property-disposal procedures.
USEInfrastructure Ontario Municipal Loan Program: assess eligible developments for municipal capital financing.
Resolve Development Conflicts Without Losing Community Benefits
- Housing
- Public Assets & Accountability
- Youth & Community Facilities
- Local Economy & Jobs
Stakeholders
Residents; community organizations; local businesses; developers; municipal employees; taxpayers.
Outcomes
Housing & Local Economy
- Fewer stalled developments.
- More housing and customers for local businesses.
Community Benefits
- Protected public facilities and services.
- Safer roads and appropriate infrastructure.
Accountability & Transparency
- Documented responses to community concerns.
- Publicly justified land exchanges.
Proposed Action
When communities oppose development over legitimate concerns, I will seek solutions that protect community interests without sacrificing housing and economic opportunities.
The City would:
- Resolve: Identify specific concerns and explore changes to the original proposal.
- Relocate: If those changes cannot resolve the conflict, examine voluntary land exchanges offering comparable development value in a more suitable location.
- Preserve: Prioritize keeping housing, investment and community services within the ward.
- Expedite: Continue existing planning work during negotiations to avoid unnecessary delays.
Land exchanges would require developer agreement, independent valuation and appropriate City approval.
Sources, Evidence & Case Studies
3100 Weston Road: A proposed 125-home development faces concerns involving traffic, infrastructure, environmental protection and longstanding community uses. Council opposed the current application while directing staff to continue negotiations.
Galleria Mall: Toronto approved a land exchange in 2018 to accommodate redevelopment, an expanded park and a replacement community centre.
Tools: Established Policy and Regulation
USEMunicipal Code Chapter 213 - Real Property: Existing municipal property transaction procedures.
USEGalleria Land Exchange - GM28.28: Established precedent for negotiated exchanges.
USE3100 Weston Road Council Direction - EY32.5: Existing directions to negotiate, review traffic impacts and pursue acquisition of specified lands.
Ward 7 Action
Start with 3100 Weston Road. Request an assessment of whether the development can proceed with appropriate protections or whether a negotiated land exchange could preserve community space while retaining the proposed housing investment in Ward 7.
Community Participation
Residents, community organizations and businesses would identify concerns and review proposed solutions before land-exchange decisions.
Build Three New Mixed-Use Housing Developments in Ward 7
- Housing
- Public Assets & Accountability
- Youth & Community Facilities
Stakeholders
Ward 7 residents; households needing affordable and RGI housing; recreation users; City staff; TDSB; local businesses; taxpayers.
Outcomes
Housing
- Three Ward 7 sites assessed for housing development.
- More affordable and RGI homes if viable projects are approved and funded.
Community Benefits
- Improved recreation facilities alongside housing.
- Continued community recreation access during reconstruction.
Economic Sustainability
- Better use of existing public land.
- Opportunities for nearby businesses and local employment.
Accountability & Transparency
- Resident input into the services provided.
- Publicly documented feasibility, costs and decisions.
Proposed Action
Seek preliminary mixed-use redevelopment assessments for three Ward 7 recreation properties:
- Driftwood Community Recreation Centre.
- Oakdale Community Centre.
- Habitant Arena, 3383 Weston Road.
Explore affordable and rent-geared-to-income housing alongside replacement or improved recreation facilities, childcare and other services identified by residents. Proposals must account for site feasibility, financing, existing community access and required approvals.
Negotiate temporary recreation access at nearby TDSB schools outside instructional hours where feasible. Any City-funded school upgrades would remain with the schools. Arrange alternative recreation services before closures.
Use the proposed citywide Toronto Builds referral and fast-track policy to move suitable sites through design, financing and approvals toward construction.
Sources, Evidence & Case Studies
Single-building development: East Bayfront Community Recreation Centre integrates recreation space into a residential building.
Coordinated civic site: Parkdale Hub plans housing alongside library, recreation and community services.
Large development site: 50 Wilson Heights Boulevard includes 1,484 planned homes, including 520 affordable rentals, with childcare, community space, retail and a park.
These examples illustrate possibilities at different site sizes, not restrictions on future proposals.
Tools: Established Policy and Regulation
USEToronto Builds - PH21.4: City-owned land housing development framework.
USEHousing Development Governance - EX25.1: existing City housing development delivery and approval processes.
USECity Planning Development Applications: statutory approval procedures.
USEInfrastructure Ontario Municipal Loan Program: financing for eligible municipal capital projects.
USETDSB Community Use of Schools: framework for negotiating access to school facilities.
Community Participation
Neighbourhood-specific surveys would identify priorities for housing, childcare, accessibility, youth and seniors' services, recreation and commercial space. Residents would be consulted on redevelopment proposals and arrangements to maintain recreation access.